Two-thirds of adults aged 65 years and older with dementia have Alzheimer's disease (AD), and the number of AD cases is predicted to increase with the growing older adult population. Although genetic risk factors for AD have been identified, only a fraction of AD cases can be explained by specific gene mutations. Studies of twins have been helpful in investigating the relative importance of genetic and environmental influences in disease development. For example, if identical (monozygotic) twins do not both have a disease, environmental factors may be implicated for its occurrence.
Margaret Gatz, Ph.D., University of Southern California, Los Angeles, and colleagues evaluated 11,884 pairs of twins from the Swedish Twin Registry to examine the association between genetic and environmental influences and AD. The study included patients from the registry who tested positive for dementia and their twins, plus a sample of twins without dementia. The researchers identified 392 pairs of twins in which one or both had AD.
The researchers estimated heritability for AD to be between 58 and 79 percent. Among pairs where both twins had AD, there was an average of 3.66 years difference in age at onset between 25 sets of identical twins, and 8.12 years difference between 20 sets of fraternal (dizygotic) twins. This lead the researchers to conclude that genes had a role in disease timing "because age at onset of AD is significantly more similar for concordant [occurring in both twins] monozygotic pairs compared with concordant dizygotic pairs." Concordance rates were higher in women, reflecting their greater longevity.
"In the largest twin study to date, we confirmed that heritability for AD is high and that the same genetic factors are influential for both men and women," the authors write. "However, nongenetic risk factors also play an important role and might be the focus for interventions to reduce disease risk or delay disease onset."
archpsyc.ama-assn/
In vitro invasion assays established that human breast tumor cells migrated much better through the involution matrix than through virgin matrix. Schedin's group next performed in vivo experiments to further confirm that post-lactation involution matrix enhances tumor cell migration (i.e. metastasis). Breast tumor cells were mixed with either involution or virgin matrix, and the mixtures were injected into the mammary fat pads of mice. Human tumor cells formed small mammary tumors, regardless of matrix source; however, the involution matrix exerted a more powerful push toward metastasis, with cells spreading to the lung, liver and kidney and promoting blood vessel development, a requirement for metastasis survival.
These data demonstrate the importance of the changing breast environment in the evolution of breast cancer. Specifically, changes in the extracellular matrix that occur during post-pregnancy involution may actually promote metastasis of breast cancer following pregnancy. The authors further offer that these data may explain why women with breast cancer diagnosed up to 5 years after pregnancy are at greater risk of developing metastases.
This work also highlights an important shift in thinking about what influences cancers to metastasize: the move from studying specific gene mutations to studying the tumor environment.
The focus on the tumor environment, or stroma, has been gaining strength in recent years, as detailed in the commentary by Sonnenschein and Soto.
ajp.amjpathol